EPSTEIN
page 4 / 907 . OCR, unverified
METADATA_SOURCE: .
METADATA_FILENAME: DOJ-OGR-00014757.jpg
----------------------------------------
NO
~]
Ke)
a
he
No
(ee)
=
Hs
_
a
~]
a
a
Ke}
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
M6SQmaxl
Carolyn credibly testit
Document 779
much when she brought
defendant's control of
the defendant on occasion paid her direct]
probable than not by a preponderance of
household and Carol
Filed 08/22/22
friends to the massages.
lyn's
Yr
Page 10 of 101 10
fied that she was paid twice as
Based on the
testimony that
find it
more
the evidence
that
Virginia was also paid more as encouragement to recruit
additional
girls.
Paragraph 9,
there's an objec
Kate in this paragraph.
deleted because Kat
the indictment.
MR. EVERDELL:
1s not
It argues that
a victim of
Your Honor,
think you said paragraph 9.
THE
number
COURT:
did.
I'm sorry.
for some reason.
doesn't assert that Kate was a statutory vic
discussed throughout
29. Thank you,
that Kate was a victim
eo)
tion to the
I'm sorry to interrupt.
I'm skipping the
Mr.
inclusion of
her name should be
the crimes charged in
first
Everdell.
t trial and the governmen
overrule this objection because the paragraph
tim as we've
t didn't contend
f the crimes charged in the indictment,
and that paragraph doesn't assert that she was.
these to
overrul
Jane.
Paragraphs 30 to 38,
the characterization of
thes
right here that
objections.
think
there's objection throughout
the defendant having groomed
the government is
the objection is conflating grooming with
enticement to
travel
for purposes of
sexual contact.
SOUTHERN
STR
CT RE
PORTERS,
(212) 805-0300
2)
Jane's
DOJ-OGR-00014757
==================== END OF root__DOJ-OGR-00014757.jpg.txt ====================
==================== DOCUMENT: root__DOJ-OGR-00014758.jpg.txt ====================
METADATA_SOURCE: .
METADATA_FILENAME: DOJ-OGR-00014758.jpg
----------------------------------------
NO
~]
Ke)
a
he
No
(ee)
=
Hs
_
a
~]
a
a
Ke}
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
M6éSOmaxl
credible trial
steps to make Jane comf
illegal sex acts with E
involving Kate,
first,
was not a vic
then,
alternativel
tim of
Yr
with a heading of
I don't
Conduct
testimony revealed additional details of
of
see that
sexualized
de
Epstein.
should includ
consent at
age 17 or a
to includin
based on th
paragraph 4
Pa
evidence th
massages.
fendant's Knowledge of
OF
ps
Paragraph 43, th
a sentenc
all times.
tein
Document 779
I think the specific request her
was that it should be removed
the crimes charged in
that it be moved to a di
Fense behavior not part of
this is necessary.
identifying and introducing to
Filed 08/22/22 Page 11 of 101 11
testimony established that the defendant took
table and encouraged her to engage in
Paragraphs 39 to 45 which describe specific conduct
well,
from the PSR because Kat
the indictment, and
ferent paragraph
relevant conduct.
overrule the objection.
involving Kate may be considered at sentencing her
the defendant's method
Epstein young girls for
Her testimony also established the
the sexualized nature of massages with
e de
that
I thin
fe
K
bove at all relevant
g
e trial evidence,
of the
PSR.
that she was above
SO
ragraph 54,
th
def
ndant contends this paragraph
Kate was above the age of
the paragraph says that Kate was
times, and I have no objection
consent at all times
the age of
I will make that change to
ndant objects that there's no
at Epstein paid for Annie's trip to Thailand. That
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.-»
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014758
==================== END OF root__DOJ-OGR-00014758.jpg.txt ====================
==================== DOCUMENT: root__DOJ-OGR-00014759.jpg.txt ====================
METADATA_SOURCE: .
METADATA_FILENAME: DOJ-OGR-00014759.jpg
----------------------------------------
~]
a
=
=
Hs
a
a
~]
a
a
Ke)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Docume
M6SQmaxl
objection is overruled. An
nt779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 12 of 101 12
nie testified to this fact at trial,
and I credit this testimony.
Paragraph 5 —- sor
makes three objections to t
objections. The record sup
ry -- did it again. 55, defendant
he paragraph. I overrule the
ports that the defendant personally
recruited Virginia to provi
when she was a minor. Jane
that the defendant was awar
credit Mr. Alessi'ts testi
Virginia, and that Virginia
de Epstein with sexualized massages
and Kate's testimony established
e that the massages were sexualized.
mony that the defendant approached
visited the residenc approached
Virginia for the first time
residence later that day.
testimony established that
Virginia was 18. In additi
the residence, the defendan
Virginia to show Carolyn --
"what to do." Carolyn then
sexualized massage involvin
explained in my resolution
conclude that there is a suf
preponderance of the eviden
incentives to encourage Vir
Paragraph 58, the